PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND CHEMICAL QUALITY OF MAILSI CITY GROUNDWATER

Authors

  • S. Abbas Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • A. Mashiatullah Isotope Application Division, Directorate of Technology, PINSTECH, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • A. Javed Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • M. S. Khan Isotope Application Division, Directorate of Technology, PINSTECH, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • S. Saleem Department of Environmental Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract

Quality of groundwater samples in Mailsi city of district Vehari was assessed using physico-chemical and chemical parameters. Twenty seven (27) groundwater samples were collected for physico-chemical and major ion analysis. Absence of carbonate ions (CO3 -2 ) in all groundwater samples indicates presence of limestone dissolution giving rise to bicarbonate. Piper diagram reveals dominance with Ca-Mg-type of water in the studied area. pH of all samples were within WHO guidelines. The mean value of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) for Mailsi groundwater is 755.1 mg/L having a range of 272 to 1667mg/L. The TDS for majority of samples lies above the guideline values as defined by the WHO. Twenty two (22) percent samples exhibit high nitrate levels; consumption of water samples with high nitrate content may produce harmful effects in children.

References

M. limouzi and D. Maidment, Project Report 397

Statistics in Water Resources, University of Texas,

Austin (2009).

R.R. Caldwell, US Geological Survey WaterResources Investigations Report 97 (1998) 5.

M.N. Bhutta, World Water Day 89 (2009) 1.

S. Foster, A. Lawrence and R., Morris, Technical

Paper 390 (1998) 21.

S. Munir, A. Mashiatullah, S. Mahmood, T. Javed,

M. S. Khan and M. Zafar, The Nucleus 48, No. 2

(2011) 149.

World Wild Life Fund, Pakistan’s Water at Risk

Report (2007).

M.A. Kahlown, M. Akram, Z.A. Soomro and

W.D. Kemper, International Commission on

Irrigation and Drainage 571 (2008) 105.

S. Shah, Institute for Social Policy and

Understanding Brief # 57 (2011).

N. M. Johnson, G.E. Likens, F.H. Bormann, D.W.

Fisher and R.S. Pierce, Water Resour. Res. 1353

No. 5 (1969) 43.

L. V. Wilcox, US Dept. Agric. Bull. 40 (1962).

G.E. Likens, F.H. Bormann, R.S. Pierce, J.S.

Eaton and N.M. Johnson, Springer-Verlag, New

York 146 (1977).

R.K. Munson and S.A. Gherini, In Acidic

Deposition and Aquatic Ecosystems: Regional

Case Studies. Springer-Verlag, New York 35

(1991) 34.

B. K. Handa, Soil Sci. 264 (1964) 98.

J. D. Hem In Study and Interpretation of the

Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water,

Publisher U.S. Geological Survey Alexandria,

USA (1985) p.30.

Punjab Municipal Service Improvement Project

(2011) 14.

WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for

Water Supply and Sanitation 85 (2011).

G. Jacks, J. Hydro. 18 (1973) 185.

M.R. Mahananda, B.P. Mohanty and N.R. Behera,

Int. J. Res. Rev. App. Sci. 2, No. 3 (2010) 284.

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Low

Dissolved Oxygen in Water Causes, Impact on

Aquatic Life – An Overview, Water Quality/

Impaired Waters Report # 3.24 (2008) 1.

A.M. Piper, U.S. Geol. Surv. Groundwater Notes

(1953) 12.

R. Malcolm, C. Soulsby, Sci. Total Environ. No.

(2001) 269.

M. Tsujimura, A. Yutaka, T. Tanaka and J.

Shimada, Journal of Hydrology 333 (2006) 47.

A. Nazir, In Groundwater Resources of Pakistan.

Ripon Press Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan (1974).

Downloads

Published

26-05-2014

How to Cite

[1]
S. Abbas, A. Mashiatullah, A. Javed, M. S. Khan, and S. Saleem, “PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND CHEMICAL QUALITY OF MAILSI CITY GROUNDWATER”, The Nucleus, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 199–205, May 2014.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>