Petrographic and Economic Aspects of the Sandstone Unit of the Kamlial Formation, Karaat Hills, South-Eastern Kohat Plateau, NW Pakistan

Authors

  • M. A. Khan Bahria University, Islamabad
  • N. U. Khattak University of Peshawar, Peshawar
  • B. Ali Bahria University, Islamabad
  • M. Yar Bahria University, Islamabad
  • M. F. Mahmood Bahria University, Islamabad
  • K. Abuzar Bahria University, Islamabad
  • U. Shakir Bahria University, Islamabad

Abstract

 

The Kamlial Formation of middle to late Miocene age is exposed in the hilly area of Karaat, district Karak, Pakistan. It mainly consist of sandstones with intercalations of shales. In order to observe different petrographic features, 16 samples were collected at an average interval of 5 m, from the sandstone unit of the formation. The studied samples mainly consist of quartz, feldspar and rock fragments with an average modal abundance of 45%, 9 % and 15 % respectively and variety of heavy and accessory minerals comprising of muscovite, biotite, garnet, epidote, monazite, tourmaline and zircon. Carbonate is the major cementing material in the studied samples of the Kamlial Formation. By plotting on the triangular diagram majority of the studied samples fall in the field of "feldspathic lithwacke". The high ratio of quartz to feldspar (Q/F=4.8) shows the mineralogical maturity, while, the abundance of matrix suggests that the sandstone is texturally immature even though it comprises of sub-rounded grains and is moderately to well-sorted. Non-undulose to weakly undulose monocrystalline quartz is in a higher proportion in the studied sections whereas the polycrystalline quartz is rare and much less abundant and predominantly consists of two to three sub-grains with straight to only slightly curved sub-grain boundaries. These characteristics of quartz indicates that the source rock is of igneous origin. The friable nature of the sandstone unit makes it a poor building stone but can be used in cement industry and other construction purposes. Kamlial Formation can host potential Uranium deposits because of its environment of deposition.

Author Biographies

M. A. Khan, Bahria University, Islamabad

Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences

N. U. Khattak, University of Peshawar, Peshawar

National Centre of Excellence in Geology,

M. Yar, Bahria University, Islamabad

Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences

M. F. Mahmood, Bahria University, Islamabad

Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences

K. Abuzar, Bahria University, Islamabad

Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences

U. Shakir, Bahria University, Islamabad

Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences

References

W.R. Dickson and C.A. Suczek.“Plate tectonics and sandstone compositions”, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, vol. 63, pp. 2164 – 2182, 1979.

A.N. Fatmi, “Lithostratigraphic units of the Kohat-Potwar Province, Indus Basin, Pakistan”, Pakistan Geological Survey Memoirs, vol. 10, pp. 94, 1973.

C.R. Meissner, J.M. Master, M.A. Rashid and M. Hussain, “Stratigraphy of the Kohat Quadrangle, Pakistan”, USGS Professional Paper, vol.716-D, pp. 30, 1974.

C. McA. Powell, “A speculative tectonic history of Pakistan and surroundings: some constraints from the Indian Ocean”, In: A. Farah and K.A. DeJong (Eds.),Geodynamics of Pakistan. Geological Survey of Pakistan Quetta, Pakistan, pp. 5-24, 1979.

P. Molnar and P. Tapponier, “Cenozoic Tectonics of Asia: Effects of a continental collision”, Science, vol. 189, pp. 419-426, 1975.

J. Stocklin, “Possible Ancient Continental margins in Iran”, In: C.A. Burk and C.L. Drake (Eds.), The Geology of Continental Margins, Springer-Verlag New York, USA, pp. 873-887, 1974.

R.L. Stonely, “Evolution of the continental margins bounding a former Southern Tethys”, In: C.A. Burk and C.L. Drake (eds.), The Geology of continental margins, Springer-Verlag New York, USA, pp. 889-903, 1974.

D.M. Davis and R.J. Lillie, “Changing mechanical response during continental collision: active examples from the foreland thrust belts of Pakistan”, J. Structural Geology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 21-34, 1994.

F.J. Pettijohn, P.E. Potter and R. Seiver, “Sand and Sandstone”, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 1987.

F.J. Pettijohn, “Sedimentary rocks”, 3rd edition, New York, USA, Harper and Row, pp. 628, 1975.

R.H. Dott, “Wacke, greywacke and matrix – what approach to immature sandstone classification?” J. Sedimentary Petrology, vol. 34, pp. 625-632, 1964.

A. Basu, “Reading provenance from detrital quartz”, In: Provenance of arenites. G.G. Zuffa (eds.), Dordrecht, Netherlands, Reidel Publ., pp. 231-247, 1985.

R.L. Folk, “Petrology of sedimentary rocks”, 2nd edition, Austin Texas, USA, Hemphills Press, pp. 182, 1974.

A. Basu, S.W. Young, L.J. Suttner, W.C. James and J.H. Mack, “Re-evaluation of the use of undulatory extinction and polycrystallinity in detrital quartz for provenance interpretation”, J. Sedimentary Petrology, vol. 45, pp. 873-882, 1975.

P.G.H. Boswell, “On the Mineralogy of sedimentary rocks”, London United Kingdom, Thomas Murby Publishers, pp. 393, 1933.

H.B. Milner, “Supplement to introduction to sedimentary petrography”, London, United Kingdom, Thomas Murby Publishers, pp.157, 1926.

K. Ullah, M. Arif and M.T. Shah, “Petrography of Sandstones from the Kamlial and Chinji Formations, Southwestern Kohat Plateau, NW Pakistan: Implications for Source Lithology and Paleoclimate”, J. Himalayan Earth Sciences, vol. 39, pp. 1-13, 2006.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2017

How to Cite

[1]
M. A. Khan, “Petrographic and Economic Aspects of the Sandstone Unit of the Kamlial Formation, Karaat Hills, South-Eastern Kohat Plateau, NW Pakistan”, The Nucleus, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 154–160, Sep. 2017.

Issue

Section

Articles